目的：了解眼科住院医师在规范化培训期间的科研培训现状及需求，为今后开展住院医师科研能力相关课程提供科学依据。方法：采用横断面调查的方式，在2021年7月间对北京大学第三医院眼科中心42名住院医师进行问卷调查，对结果进行数据分析。从科研现状、科研能力及科研需求3个方面来进行分析，其中科研能力通过常规科研技能掌握程度和软件的使用情况来评分，最后将各项得分汇总得到的分数为科研能力得分。对科研现状及可能能力得分进行了相关分析，其他数据按数据类型选择对应的分析方法。结果：共42名北京大学第三医院住院医师参与了问卷调查，其中男20名，女22名，平均年龄25岁。有90.5%的住院医师参与过科研工作，而科研内容主要来自及导师布置(90.5%)。只有14.3%的住院医师具备良好的科研能力(科研能力得分在18分及以上)。此外，有92.9%的住院医师认为临床研究有助于临床技能的理解，97.6%的参与者认为非常有必要进行临床研究方法的继续教育培训。结论：眼科住院医师科研能力普遍偏低，目前的规范化培训不能满足住院医师科研能力培养的需求，在课程设计及内容安排上需要更广泛更具实际意义的拓展。

Objective: To understand the current situation and needs of scientific research training for ophthalmologists in general hospitals during standardized training, and to provide scientific basis for the future development of courses to improve the scientific research capabilities of residents. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was used to conduct a questionnaire survey among 42 residents in the Eye Center of Peking University Third Hospital in July 2021, and the results were analyzed. We conduct research from three aspects: scientific research status, scientific research ability and scientific research needs. The scientific research ability is scored by the mastery of conventional scientific research skills and the use of software. Finally, the score obtained by summarizing the various scores is the scientific research ability score. Correlation analysis is carried out on the status of scientific research and possible ability scores, and the corresponding analysis methods are selected according to the data type for other data. Results: A total of 42 residents of Peking University Third Hospital participated in the questionnaire survey, including 20 males and 22 females, with an average age of 25 years. 90.5% of residents have participated in scientific research, and the content of scientific research mainly comes from the arrangement of supervisors (90.5%). Only 14.3% of residents have good scientific research capabilities (research ability scores of

18 points and above). In addition, 92.9% of residents believe that clinical research is helpful to the understanding of clinical skills, and 97.6% of participants believe that it is necessary to conduct continuing education and training on clinical research methods. Conclusion: The scientific research ability of ophthalmology residents is generally low. The current standardized training cannot meet the needs of the residents’ scientific research ability training. The curriculum design and content arrangement need more extensive and practical expansion.