论著

智能语音随访系统在先天性白内障患儿术后随访中的应用与分析

Application and analysis of artificial intelligence voice system in postoperative follow-up of children with congenital cataract

:23-29
 
目的:探索智能语音随访系统在医疗场景中的新型应用服务模式并分析其在新冠肺炎疫情期间的应用效果,以此评估该系统应用于互联网医院开展医疗咨询服务的实际效能。方法:本研究应用智能语音随访系统针对先天性白内障患儿术后的常见问题进行回访。首先,针对随访目的,设计出完善的结构化随访内容与步骤。其次,部署智能外呼系统自动拨打用户电话,并通过语音识别技术对用户的每次应答进行识别,根据用户的应答自动跳转到下一个随访步骤,在完成一系列问答后根据用户的回答给出恰当的建议,实现电话随访的自动化与智能化。收集2020年2月24日至2月28日期间,智能语音随访系统随访的电话内容、呼叫时间、患儿资料等数据,采用描述性统计分析。结果:2020年2月24日至2月28日期间,中山大学中山眼科中心应用智能语音随访系统电话共随访1154例,其中收到有效回访数据561例,平均有效回访率48.6%。有效回访人群中,有204位(36.4%)家属认为疫情期间复诊时间延长,对宝宝眼睛的恢复有影响,309位(55.1%)家属认为对宝宝眼睛的恢复没有影响。360位(64.2%)先天性白内障患儿眼睛恢复情况良好,没有出现不良反应,169位(30.1%)患儿出现不良反应和体征,包括瞳孔区有白点,眼睛发红和有眼屎流眼泪等。统计患儿不同行为显示,有417位(74.3%)患儿佩戴眼镜,135位(24.1%)患儿没有佩戴眼镜,另有9位(1.6%)患儿佩戴眼镜情况不清楚,经常揉眼的患儿更容易出现眼睛发红(20.4%)、眼睛有眼屎或流眼泪(17.0%)和瞳孔区有白点(6.8%)等不良反应。结论:智能语音随访系统在临床随访中显示出巨大的应用潜力,可作为一种新型的智能医疗服务模式。
Objective: This study was designed to explore its potential value for new medical service model based on the intelligent voice follow-up system and analyze its application effect during the outbreak of COVID-19. The actual effectiveness of this intelligent voice follow-up system applied in the Internet hospital to carry out medical consultation service was discussed. Methods: In this study, an intelligent voice follow up system was developed for postoperative follow-up of children with congenital cataract. First, a well-designed and structured questionnaire contents were developed for postoperative follow-up. Secondly, the intelligent voice follow-up system was deployed. The system would automatically jump to the next follow-up step according to the user’s response, and give appropriate suggestions. Finally, the data of telephone recording, call time, children’s attributes were collected and statistically analyzed. Results: From February 24 to March 15, 2020, 561 families of children with congenital cataract from Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center were recruited by using the intelligent voice follow-up system. The system completed a total of 1 154 calls, of which 561 cases received follow-up data, reaching an average effective call rate of 48.6%. Among 561 cases, 204 (36.4%) thought that the extended time of follow-up visit would affect the recovery of children, while 309 (55.1%) thought that it exerted no effect on the recovery. 360 children (64.2%) achieved good ocular recovery without complications, whereas 169 cases (30.1%) developed ocular symptoms. These include white spots in the pupil area, redness and eye secretions. Statistics of different behavior of children showed that there were 417 (74.3%) children wearing glasses, 135 (24.1%) children did not wear glasses, another 9 (1.6%) children wearing glasses were not clear, often rubbing the eyes of children were more likely to appear redness (20.4%), eye secretions (17.0%) and white spots in the pupil area (6.8%) and other adverse reactions. Conclusion: The intelligent voice follow-up system shows great application potential in clinical follow-up, which can be employed as a new service mode of intelligent medical treatment.
论著

光学眼科生物测量仪StarEyes 900与IOLMaster 500对眼球生物学测量的一致性评价

Consistency evaluation of eyeball biological measurements using StarEyes 900 and IOLMaster 500

:125-130
 
目的:评价StarEyes 900(万灵帮桥,中国)与IOLMaster 500(蔡司,德国)2种眼科光学生物测量仪测量健康受试者眼部参数的差异性、相关性及一致性。方法:前瞻性观察2021年6月至7月于中山大学中山眼科中心进行眼部检查的62例健康受试者共124只眼,分别通过StarEyes 900与IOLMaster 500完成眼轴长度(axial length,AL)、最小角膜屈光力径线上角膜曲率(keratometry for the flattest meridian,Kf)、最大角膜屈光力径线上角膜曲率(keratometry for the steepest meridian,Ks)、平均角膜曲率(mean keratometry,Km)、角膜白到白直径(white-to-white corneal diameter,WTW)等参数的测量,采用配对t检验、Pearson相关分析和Bland-Altman法对其测量结果的差异进行评价。结果:StarEyes 900与IOLMaster 500测量的AL分别为(24.18±1.08) mm和(24.16±1.08) mm;Kf分别为(42.84±1.65) D和(43.04±1.57) D;Ks分别为(44.34±1.90) D和(44.17±1.80) D;Km分别为(43.59±1.73) D和(43.61±1.64) D;WTW分别为(11.64±0.29) mm和(11.64±0.30) mm。StarEyes 900与IOLMaster 500在测量Km、WTW时,其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而在AL、Kf、Ks的测量上差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。其中StarEyes 900所测的AL和Ks值大于IOLMaster 500,而Kf、Km和WTW值则小于IOLMaster 500。经Pearson相关分析,2种仪器的测量结果均表现出较高的相关性;经Bland-Altman法评价,2种仪器的测量结果均表现出较高的一致性。结论:StarEyes 900与IOLMaster 500测量的Km、WTW均表现出较高的一致性,2种方法可互为参考;测量的AL、Kf、Ks存在的差异具有统计学意义;各项参数的测量均具有较好的相关性和一致性。
Objective: To evaluate the difference, correlation and agreement of eye parameters measured by StarEyes 900 visual function analyzer (Wan Ling Bang Qiao, China) and IOLMaster 500 (Carl Zeiss, Germany) swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer. Methods: A prospective study was designed involving 62 healthy subjects (124 eyes) undergoing ophthalmic examinations in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center from June 2021 to July 2021. Data from their both eyes were selected for analysis in all patients. Axial length (AL), keratometry for the steepest meridian (Ks), keratometry for the flattest meridian (Kf), mean keratometry (Km) and corneal diameter (WTW) were measured by the StarEyes 900 visual function analyzer and IOLMaster 500 swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer. A paired t-test was used to analyze the differences in measurement results. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation. Bland-Airman method was used to assess the agreement of the instruments. Results: The AL, Kf, Ks, Km and WTW obtained by StarEyes 900 and IOLMaster 500 were (24.18±1.08) mm and (24.16±1.08) mm, (42.84±1.65) D and (43.04±1.57) D, (44.34±1.90) D and (44.17±1.80) D, (43.59±1.73) D and (43.61±1.64) D, and (11.64±0.29) mm and (11.64±0.30) mm, respectively. The Km and WTW of the two devices showed no significant difference (P>0.05), while the AL, Ks and Kf showed significant differences (all P<0.01). The AL and Ks obtained by StarEyes 900 were higher than by IOLMaster 500, while the Kf, Km and WTW were lower. The measurements of five aforementioned biometric parameters by both devices showed good correlation by Pearson correlation coefficient and good agreement by Bland-Airman. Conclusion: The Km and WTW measured by the two devices showed no significant difference, and provided references to one another. The difference in AL, Kf and Ks between the two devices showed significant differences. All of the measurements showed good correlation by Pearson correlation coefficient and good agreement by Bland-Airman.
其他期刊
  • 眼科学报

    主管:中华人民共和国教育部
    主办:中山大学
    承办:中山大学中山眼科中心
    主编:林浩添
    主管:中华人民共和国教育部
    主办:中山大学
    浏览
  • Eye Science

    主管:中华人民共和国教育部
    主办:中山大学
    承办:中山大学中山眼科中心
    主编:林浩添
    主管:中华人民共和国教育部
    主办:中山大学
    浏览
推荐阅读
出版者信息
中山眼科



中山大学