Abstract: In this review, recent studies regarding riboflavin-ultraviolet A (UVA) collagen cross-linking for the treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) were reviewed. English written studies about acanthamoeba, keratitis, riboflavin and collagen cross-linking were retrieved from PubMed search engine (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed). Although there were significant numbers of cases reporting the effectiveness of riboflavin-UVA collagen cross-linking in AK, experimental studies (in vivo and in vitro) failed to verify amoebicidal or cysticidal effect of riboflavin-UVA collagen cross-linking. In conclusion, the efficacy of riboflavin-UVA collagen cross-linking for the treatment of AK is still debatable. It is necessary to conduct a prospective case-control study for clear guidance for clinicians.

Abstract: In this review, recent studies regarding riboflavin-ultraviolet A (UVA) collagen cross-linking for the treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) were reviewed. English written studies about acanthamoeba, keratitis, riboflavin and collagen cross-linking were retrieved from PubMed search engine (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed). Although there were significant numbers of cases reporting the effectiveness of riboflavin-UVA collagen cross-linking in AK, experimental studies (in vivo and in vitro) failed to verify amoebicidal or cysticidal effect of riboflavin-UVA collagen cross-linking. In conclusion, the efficacy of riboflavin-UVA collagen cross-linking for the treatment of AK is still debatable. It is necessary to conduct a prospective case-control study for clear guidance for clinicians.

Abstract: Advances in intraocular lens (IOL) design have rendered cataract surgery a refractive procedure. Newer IOL types include bifocal, trifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. Their basic difference nestles in the number of focal points that each lens provides, which in turn leads to different visual outcomes. Familiarity of surgeons with the various characteristics of each lens is of utmost importance for accurate IOL selection to match each patient’s needs. In this review, we aim to compare the clinical outcomes after implantation of multifocal and EDOF IOLs in terms of distance, intermediate and near vision, contrast sensitivity, and reading performance. Finally, we discuss the defocus curve and the optical and photic phenomena associated with each type of IOL.

Abstract: Advances in intraocular lens (IOL) design have rendered cataract surgery a refractive procedure. Newer IOL types include bifocal, trifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. Their basic difference nestles in the number of focal points that each lens provides, which in turn leads to different visual outcomes. Familiarity of surgeons with the various characteristics of each lens is of utmost importance for accurate IOL selection to match each patient’s needs. In this review, we aim to compare the clinical outcomes after implantation of multifocal and EDOF IOLs in terms of distance, intermediate and near vision, contrast sensitivity, and reading performance. Finally, we discuss the defocus curve and the optical and photic phenomena associated with each type of IOL.

Abstract: Orbital fractures generally do not cause eyelid malposition. Studies have shown that mostly eyelid malposition is mainly due to the choice of surgical approaches of orbital fracture repair. Approaches are divided into transcutaneous and transconjunctival ones. The application of orbital fracture approaches depends on fractures’ range and the surgeons’ preferences. Eyelid malposition after orbital fracture surgery is not only an aesthetic concern but also a functional complication, which will cause eyes discomfort, such as corneal exposure and ocular irritation. Some patients may have multiple types of eyelid malposition. In this review, we summarized the surgical approaches of orbital fractures and the complications including scar, ectropion, retraction, entropion, flattening, laceration and lacrimal canaliculus avulsion and notch deformity that associated with eyelid, especially the lower eyelid. Reports revealed that the scar usually occurred in infraorbital incisions compared with subtarsal and subciliary incisions, and the transconjunctival approach had a higher incidence of entropion and flattening, and less ectropion than the transcutaneous approach. Meanwhile, pathogenesis of eyelid malposition after orbital fracture surgery are discussed. Furthermore, to prevent eyelid malposition complications, doctors should choose the appropriate orbital fracture approach according to the patient’s needs, and delicate tissue management, technical expertise, and meticulous hemostasis are necessary. Conservative treatment with taping, lubricating ointment, and steroid for eyelid malposition complications should be performed first, and then surgical intervention when the conservative treatment fails.

Abstract: Orbital fractures generally do not cause eyelid malposition. Studies have shown that mostly eyelid malposition is mainly due to the choice of surgical approaches of orbital fracture repair. Approaches are divided into transcutaneous and transconjunctival ones. The application of orbital fracture approaches depends on fractures’ range and the surgeons’ preferences. Eyelid malposition after orbital fracture surgery is not only an aesthetic concern but also a functional complication, which will cause eyes discomfort, such as corneal exposure and ocular irritation. Some patients may have multiple types of eyelid malposition. In this review, we summarized the surgical approaches of orbital fractures and the complications including scar, ectropion, retraction, entropion, flattening, laceration and lacrimal canaliculus avulsion and notch deformity that associated with eyelid, especially the lower eyelid. Reports revealed that the scar usually occurred in infraorbital incisions compared with subtarsal and subciliary incisions, and the transconjunctival approach had a higher incidence of entropion and flattening, and less ectropion than the transcutaneous approach. Meanwhile, pathogenesis of eyelid malposition after orbital fracture surgery are discussed. Furthermore, to prevent eyelid malposition complications, doctors should choose the appropriate orbital fracture approach according to the patient’s needs, and delicate tissue management, technical expertise, and meticulous hemostasis are necessary. Conservative treatment with taping, lubricating ointment, and steroid for eyelid malposition complications should be performed first, and then surgical intervention when the conservative treatment fails.

Abstract: A smooth and timely fitting of a visually appealing, custom-made eye prosthesis after the loss of an eye is not only essential from a cosmetic point of view but above all facilitates good social and psychological rehabilitation. Cryolite glass prostheses must be replaced at least once a year, PMMA prostheses polished once a year and renewed every five years. In children, especially in growth phases, the fit of the prosthesis should be checked at least every six months and adjusted, if necessary. Ocularists and ophthalmologists should determine an individual cleaning procedure together with the patient, which depends on both the prosthesis material and external factors. Complications such as allergic, giant papillary, viral, and bacterial conjunctivitis or even blepharoconjunctivitis sicca must be detected and treated at an early stage to avoid discomfort and to maintain the ability of prosthesis wear. In the case of inflammation-induced shrinkage of the conjunctival fornices or post-enucleation socket syndrome, surgical interventions are necessary. In summary, an early supply with an eye prosthesis, adequate treatment of complications, and attention to psychological aspects, form the basis for a successful long-term rehabilitation of anophthalmic patients.

Abstract: A smooth and timely fitting of a visually appealing, custom-made eye prosthesis after the loss of an eye is not only essential from a cosmetic point of view but above all facilitates good social and psychological rehabilitation. Cryolite glass prostheses must be replaced at least once a year, PMMA prostheses polished once a year and renewed every five years. In children, especially in growth phases, the fit of the prosthesis should be checked at least every six months and adjusted, if necessary. Ocularists and ophthalmologists should determine an individual cleaning procedure together with the patient, which depends on both the prosthesis material and external factors. Complications such as allergic, giant papillary, viral, and bacterial conjunctivitis or even blepharoconjunctivitis sicca must be detected and treated at an early stage to avoid discomfort and to maintain the ability of prosthesis wear. In the case of inflammation-induced shrinkage of the conjunctival fornices or post-enucleation socket syndrome, surgical interventions are necessary. In summary, an early supply with an eye prosthesis, adequate treatment of complications, and attention to psychological aspects, form the basis for a successful long-term rehabilitation of anophthalmic patients.